Opposition Builds to Haspel and Pompeo Nominations

J20 Trials Pushed Back, As After Nearly a Year and a Half Prosecutors Claim They Need More Time
April 13, 2018
US Capitol at Night
Defending Rights & Dissent Warns Congress About New Authorization for Use of Military Force
April 23, 2018


Things are looking dim for torture apologist Mike Pompeo and his bid to become Secretary of State. Only one vote on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee stands between him and the ignominy of his nomination being “unfavorably referred” out of the committee. It doesn’t guarantee that his nomination will be defeated by the full Senate, but it will help us build more opposition.

Take Action: Tell your Senators to Vote No on Pompeo and Haspel

Meanwhile, Haspel is facing tons of criticism for her involvement in the CIA torture program and trying to cover it up.  Haspel’s role in ordering the destruction of video tapes of black site torture was disclosed in a book by former CIA law senior lawyer, John Rizzo. In the face of CIA claims that her role was not as he described, he responded: “All I can say is that I stand by everything I wrote in my book about the tapes episode, and no one from the Agency has asked me to correct anything I wrote.”  Another CIA official, quoted anonymously in the Daily Beast said, “To the best of my understanding, she ran the interrogation program… Her becoming director absolutely terrifies me. Once I heard her name, I immediately thought, ‘Oh, God.’”  Senators Feinstein, Heinrich, and Wyden wrote another letter (their fifth) to the CIA demanding the declassification of information related to Haspel’s career.

Take Action: Tell your Senators to Vote No on Pompeo and Haspel

A diverse group of organizations from the faith, human rights, civil liberties, and open government communities urged Senators to oppose Gina Haspel’s nomination for CIA Director in a letter sent to the Hill today. DRAD signed on to the letter (also available here), which was initiated by the Center for Victims of Torture:

April 19, 2018

Dear Senator:

We are a diverse group of organizations from the faith, human rights, civil liberties, and open government communities, among many others, writing to urge you to oppose Gina Haspel’s nomination for CIA Director. It remains undisputed that Ms. Haspel was deeply involved in the CIA’s now-defunct torture program. As such, a vote to confirm her is incompatible with a meaningful commitment to the prohibition on torture.

It remains undisputed that Ms. Haspel was deeply involved in the CIA’s now-defunct torture program. As such, a vote to confirm her is incompatible with a meaningful commitment to the prohibition on torture.

Unfortunately, the precise details of Ms. Haspel’s participation in “enhanced interrogation” are still secret. Senators deserve comprehensive information about Ms. Haspel’s background and should refuse to take a vote on her nomination without it. But until the CIA declassifies such an exhaustive record, and unless that record proves Ms. Haspel played no role in the torture program—which former CIA General Counsel John Rizzo describes her as having “run”—we believe she is unfit to serve as the public-facing director for one of the government’s most powerful and secretive agencies. That she reportedly advocated for, and contributed to, destroying videotape evidence that captured the brutal reality of what “enhanced interrogation” really meant only further tarnishes her candidacy.

Some answer these grave concerns by claiming Ms. Haspel is a decorated intelligence professional, experienced, and well-respected at the CIA. That may all be true. But responsibility for torture is an extraordinary moral offense that ordinary kinds of qualifications simply cannot overcome.

Others have suggested that Congress should excuse Ms. Haspel’s choices because she was only following orders. Whether or not you consider that a plausible legal defense it is no justification in the present context. The question before you is not whether Ms. Haspel should be indicted, or investigated, or otherwise punished. President Trump is asking you to promote her to lead the CIA. Following orders or not, Ms. Haspel chose to embrace a program that, as she knew better than most, was brutally dismantling other human beings both physically and psychologically. According to internal CIA e-mails, the agency’s own personnel—stationed at the “black site” prison Ms. Haspel is credibly reported to have run in late 2002—were “profoundly affected” by the torture in which they were involved. Some were disturbed “to the point of tears and choking up.” One official warned that several personnel were “likely to elect transfer” if the torture continued. Even if Ms. Haspel arrived on-site after these particular torture sessions ended (but before the next round, with a new detainee, began), it is nearly impossible to imagine that she did not know the gravity of what was happening. She chose to help drive the program forward nonetheless.

If Ms. Haspel’s nomination advances to a hearing, she may well promise not to resurrect the CIA torture program, even if ordered to do so, because she believes that current law clearly prohibits it.  Senators who rely on that kind of assurance to justify supporting Ms. Haspel do so at substantial risk. First, no matter what Ms. Haspel says during a hearing, any vote related to her nomination (whether in committee or on the Senate floor) will be seen as a referendum on torture—by the public, by U.S. allies and enemies, and perhaps most alarmingly by the President, who has openly advocated for torture. Second, Ms. Haspel has already been tested when it matters most, and she failed. Torture has always been unlawful, notwithstanding the Justice Department’s notorious, results-oriented legal reasoning in the aftermath of the September 11, 2001 attacks. If the Trump White House is going to tell the next CIA director to bring back “enhanced interrogation”—or to pursue other reckless and damaging activities in areas like surveillance, or the use of force—such orders are most likely to issue in the wake of another national crisis, and again be accompanied by purported legal justification. In those circumstances, why would members expect Ms. Haspel to choose differently?

This is a defining moment: Senators who are truly committed to turning the page on one of the darkest chapters in American history should refuse to reward one of that chapter’s authors. We urge you to oppose Gina Haspel’s nomination for CIA Director.

Sincerely,

American Family Voices

American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee

Arab American Institute

Campaign for Liberty

Center for Constitutional Rights

Center for Victims of Torture

Center of Concern

Chicago Area Peace Action

Coalition for an Ethical Psychology

CODEPINK

Conference of Major Superiors of Men

Council on American-Islamic Relations

Defending Rights & Dissent

Demand Progress Action

Disciples Center for Public Witness

Emgage Action

Friends of the Earth U.S.

Government Accountability Project

Government Information Watch

Historians for Peace and Democracy

Human Rights Clinic (Columbia Law School)

Human Rights First

Human Rights Watch

Indivisible

Institute for People’s Engagement

Just Foreign Policy

Justice for Muslims Collective

Latin America Working Group

Libertarian Party of North Carolina

Massachusetts Peace Action

Mid-Missouri Fellowship of Reconciliation (FOR)

National Network for Arab American Communities

National Religious Campaign Against Torture

No More Guantanamos

Nonviolence International

North Carolina Stop Torture Now

Northern Illinois Justice for Our Neighbors

Open Society Policy Center

Open the Government

Peace Action

PEN America

Physicians for Human Rights

Poligon Education Fund

Psychologists for Social Responsibility

Public Citizen

RootsAction.org

Sikh American Legal Defense and Education Fund

T’ruah: The Rabbinic Call for Human Rights

The Quaker Initiative to End Torture

Threshold Foundation

Torture Abolition and Survivors Support International

UURISE – Unitarian Universalist Refugee & Immigrant Services & Education

Veterans For Peace Chapter 23 (Rochester, NY)

Western States Legal Foundation

Win Without War

X-Lab