Retweet This: CBP’s Plan to Ask Visitors to the US Their Social Media Identifiers Is a Bad Idea

NYPD Officer
NYPD Broke the Rules Over and Over Again, Investigation Finds
August 26, 2016
Police in Riot Gear Closeup
67 Organizations Urge Justice Dept. to Improve Data Collection Mandate on Deaths in Police Custody
August 30, 2016

Over 22 million people visit the US on the Visa Waiver Program (people coming from Europe, Japan, South Korea and Taiwan). So when the US Customs and Border Patrol (CPB) announced that the agency was seeking a rule change to be able to ask each and every one of them for their social media identifiers, a few eyebrows were raised.

For starters, the program would be impractical, useless and highly invasive.

CPB says they need to dig into visitors’ social media activity¬†in order to‚Äúprovide DHS greater clarity and visibility to possible nefarious activity and connections.‚ÄĚ But, the program would be optional. So, if you were a terrorist active on social media, would you provide your twitter handle? More importantly,¬†it is unclear just how many travelers would feel like they could voluntarily decline to provide the information requested nor is it clear how the CBP would interpret a failure to disclose social media identifiers.

The very request for a social media identifier is hopelessly broad and vague. As the Center for Democracy and Technology pointed out, such a request could refer to anything from someone’s accounts on Trip Advisor and Yelp to their Facebook and Twitter to more intimate social media platforms like Grindr and Tinder. The latter set of options would mean individuals turning over personal and private information to invasive government entities.

Not only is it not entirely clear just what information CBP wants, it is entirely opaque into how it intends to use such information. This is particularly distressing given that this program is a means of intelligence gathering and such information can and most likely will be shared with intelligence agencies, such as the National Security Agency or the FBI.

Such a move by the CBP also puts political expression at risk. While the CBP has not enlightened us to how they plan to use their information, we know that the United States has a long history, including under the present administration, of attempting to bar individuals from the US, because of their political views. We also know that the intelligence community has continuously displayed an inability to distinguish between political speech and national security threats. Given that many people use social media to express their political beliefs or affiliate with like-minded individuals. CBP’s collection of social media identifiers provides intelligence agencies with fertile grounds to gather information on individuals’ political beliefs. Knowing that they may have to turn over their social media identifier or be refused entry to the United States, individuals could begin a process of self-censorship.

And don’t take comfort in the fact that the program is aimed only at non-US citizens. It will have US repercussions for US citizens. By ensnaring the social media profiles of those applying for a visa waiver, CBP will also suck up potential information on US citizens with whom they are¬†communicating via social media.

Additionally, visa waiver programs are based heavily on reciprocity–if the US starts surveilling the social media accounts of other countries’ citizens, it is possible for them to start doing the same thing to US citizens traveling abroad. This is not an entirely unlikely scenario, while Israeli citizens are not currently party to the visa waiver program, the Israeli government has forced US citizens trying to enter Israel to give them access to email and social media accounts. If the US government begins similar practices, it is likely that other governments will follow suit.

Given the intense suspicionless surveillance the US government has subjected Muslims to, it is likely that will be disportionately impacted by this program.

The CBP’s program is yet another suspicionless surveillance program. Like all such programs it should be rejected on its face, as¬†they are not only unduly invasive of privacy, but have the potential to facilitate improper political spying. The CBP’s program is particularly insidious given its broad nature and the sensitive information that can be gleaned from social media identifiers, information than can then be potentially shared widely within the intelligence community.¬†Whether optional or not, the CBP’s proposal is unacceptable.

The Bill of Rights Defense Committee/Defending Dissent Foundation and 27 other advocacy organizations submitted comments to the US Customs and Border Patrol detailing our concerns with CBP’s proposal to ask visitors to the US their social media identifiers.

Read the letter

Deeper dive: Comments submitted by the Center for Democracy and Technology, the Electronic Frontier Foundation, the ACLU, and Access Now