Two New Lawsuits Challenge Unconstitutional Anti-Boycott Laws

It’s Bill of Rights Day: Celebrate Our Movement!
December 15, 2018
Video surveillance cameras for monitoring on streets
Congress, Police, Protesters and Surveillance
December 24, 2018

Arkansas and Texas aren’t unique in having laws on the books aimed at penalizing supporters of Boycotts, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) for Palestinian rights. They are among 26 states to have enacted such laws. Arkansas and Texas have also joined another growing subset of states–those who face First Amendment challenges to their anti-BDS laws.

On December 11, 2018 the Arkansas Times announced that it is challenging Arkansas’s anti-BDS law in court. Under Arkansas’s anti-BDS law, recipients of state contracts must either certify that they do not boycott Israel or reduce their fees by 20% For years, the schools in the University of Arkansas system have advertised in the paper. Yet, recently the University of Arkansas-Pulaski Technical College told the Arkansas Times  that in order for the school to continue to advertise in the paper it would have to certify that it did not boycott Israel or reduce its fees. As the Arkansas Times explained, the school “sent over what looked like a loyalty oath as a condition of payment.” The Arkansas Times does not boycott Israel and has never taken an editorial position in support of BDS. As journalist, however, they are fully committed to the First Amendment and refuse to comply with a law that deprives them of their First Amendment rights. They are being represented by the American Civil Liberties Union of Arkansas.

On December 17, 2018  Bahia Amawi filed a lawsuit against Texas’s anti-BDS law. From 2009 until the present, Amawi had been contracted by the Pflugerville Independent School District to work as a speech pathologist. Amawi holds a master’s degree in speech pathology and speaks English, German, and Arabic fluently. She had worked with children ages 3-11 and had been providing assessments to students from the district’s growing Arabic speaking population. When she was given her contract renewal for the upcoming year she was asked to certify she did not boycott Israel or its settlements in the Occupied Palestinian Territories. Amawi is a supporter of Palestinian rights and personally boycotts Israeli products. By refusing to pledge to refrain from boycotting Israel, she can no longer be employed as a speech pathologist. She is being represented by the CAIR Legal Defense Fund. Texas Governor George Abbot has responded to the lawsuit on Twitter:

If past litigation is any indicator both plaintiffs are likely to be successful. Lawsuits against similar anti-BDS laws in Kansas and Arizona resulted in federal judges granting preliminary injunctions. In both cases, the judges concluded that boycotts for Palestinian human rights constituted expressive activity and the plaintiffs would be irreparably harmed by being deprived of their First Amendment rights without an injunction.

Since the first anti-BDS laws were proposed in New York and Maryland in 2014, Defending Rights & Dissent has opposed them as an affront to the First Amendment. The challenges brought to those laws highlight the reasons why we opposed them.